<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Victorhew Photography - Malaysia Professional Wedding Photographer base in Penang &#187; Gear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.victor-hew.com/category/gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.victor-hew.com</link>
	<description>Malaysia Wedding Photographer - Victor Hew</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My little Nikon D3s Review and a personal opinion.</title>
		<link>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/my-little-d3s-review-just-my-personal-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/my-little-d3s-review-just-my-personal-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victor-hew.com/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite my busy week, I still manage to borrow this top notch dslr from a good friend to play around with. Despite having soooo many technical reviews over the web, I thought I&#8217;d like to add in one more personal my own hands on review about it. Using a D3s wasn&#8217;t hard for me as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite my busy week, I still manage to borrow this top notch dslr from a good friend to play around with. Despite having soooo many technical reviews over the web, I thought I&#8217;d like to add in one more personal my own hands on review about it. Using a D3s wasn&#8217;t hard for me as I&#8217;m a user of D700, looking at the menus, they are pretty much identical, except for some in-built flash settings, of course D3s doesn&#8217;t have a built in flash, its being traded off with a 100% viewfinder I suppose.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Button Layout and the feel of D3s</strong></span></p>
<p>As we all know, the D3s comes with an inbuilt vertical grip, the layout of the buttons are pretty much the same as the D700, however, i find the multiselector on the D3s is a little far away for my thumb to reach as compared to my D700. Apart from that, I&#8217;m also getting alot of misfiring from the vertical grip shutter button, I had to lock the vertical shutter button whenever I&#8217;m not using it.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">White Balance</span></strong></p>
<p>Dpreview gave the D3s as a cons in this aspect, I&#8217;m not sure what dpreview was comparing the D3s with. But personally, I find it more accurate than my D700.  Under tricky light, its auto white balance performs better than my d700.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Autofocus</strong></span></p>
<p>Under low light conditions, autofocus on this SLR is pretty impressive, its a tad faster than the D700, but its still a little slower compared to Canon system. I&#8217;m pretty disappointed in this aspect coming from a RM14,400 top of the line DSLR. However, focusing fast doesn&#8217;t mean its accurate, the thing I like about Canon is that it focuses really fast BUT its inaccurate! I was an avid canon user a few years back, started from a 350D, to 30D and then 50D. In my opinion, the 50D focuses really fast, but it just wont nail the shot! Unlike Nikon systems, they are a little slower, but it nails the shot almost 90% of the time, while Canon systems misses it alot. So, the D3s focuses fast and accurate while the canon system I used previously focuses very fast, but very inaccurate!</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m comparing autofocus under low light conditions, I&#8217;m sure D3s performs extremely well in bright lit events like sports events, or arenas. I&#8217;m giving my opinion base on my usage for my wedding assignments.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>ISO performance</strong></span></p>
<p>Here comes the exciting part, the ISO performance. The Nikon D3s has yet again reach new heights in terms of usable ISO. The previous D3 has already set a new industry standard for the maximum usable ISO performance at 6400. This time around, the D3s brought the record to 1 stop higher to an impressive 12800. Does it live up to its name? I&#8217;ll let the test shots explain itself. I&#8217;m not going to do a 400% zoom to try to look for little little grains, but rather I&#8217;d prefer to see its overall as we all would normal view a photo. So, here goes</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Starting with ISO3200</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1434" title="3200" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/3200.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="674" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">ISO6400, still looking impressively clean</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1435" title="6400" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/6400.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="674" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">ISO12800!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1436" title="12800" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/12800.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="674" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">ISO H1, 25600. hmm&#8230;it sure looks usable</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1437" title="H1" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/H1.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="674" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">ISO H2, 51200. Still acceptable I guess.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1438" title="H2" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/H2.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="674" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">ISO H3, 102400. Ok, this is a little too far out. But, its impressive enough that I can still can see the image itself.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1439" title="H3" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/H3.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="674" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">My personal conclusion</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Although autofocus is a little slower than the canon system in low light, but I can accept it as long as its ACCURATE! Needless to say, ISO performance is indeed impressive as claimed by alot of other reviewers out there. As for video recording, maybe its not as impressive as the 5D markII as it doesn&#8217;t supports Full HD, but I&#8217;ve tried it, 720p looks impressive enough for videos! Would I get it, hell yeah! It&#8217;d definitely help me alot in knocking up another notch for my ISO so my flash wont have to work so hard through out my low light event coverage. Not to forget, it focuses fast and accurate too.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
	<div class="p3-fb-like-btn-wrap">
		<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.victor-hew.com%2Fgear%2Fmy-little-d3s-review-just-my-personal-opinion%2F&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=like&colorscheme=light&width=450&height=35" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:35px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
	</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/my-little-d3s-review-just-my-personal-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VRII review (testing VRII!!)</title>
		<link>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/pushing-the-limits-of-the-new-nikkor-70-200mm-vrii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/pushing-the-limits-of-the-new-nikkor-70-200mm-vrii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikkor 70-200mm VRII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor lens review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VRII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victor-hew.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have got the chance to borrow a new 70-200 VRII for a try. Since this is a new lens, there aren&#8217;t many reviews about it yet, so I&#8217;d take this opportunity to share some of my thoughts about this lens. Do take note this article will not contains much technical aspects of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I have got the chance to borrow a new 70-200 VRII for a try. Since this is a new lens, there aren&#8217;t many reviews about it yet, so I&#8217;d take this opportunity to share some of my thoughts about this lens. Do take note this article will not contains much technical aspects of the lens, you can get the spec <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/zoom/af-s_70-200mmf_28g_vr2/index.htm" target="_blank">here</a>. Needless to say, image quality from corner to corner is much better compared to the VR I version.</p>
<p>What I was really interested was pushing the limit of the new VRII which Nikon claim to be able to support up to 4 amazing stops and i was even more intrigue by nikon&#8217;s recommendation to set VR to &#8220;Active&#8221; for in-car shooting. So i did a few trials. <img src='http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Shot taken with 1/60sec in-car with VR setting to &#8220;Active&#8221;. When you&#8217;re shooting in car, the shutter speed i can manage the shot varies alot depending on the road condition, but on a straight malaysian slightly bumpy roads, i still manage to get this shot at 1/60 sec shutter speed.</p>
<p>Take note that all the shots below do not have any photoshops, these are directly from camera, only photoshop done was to resizing, everything else is original shot.</p>
<p>1/60 sec at 70mm</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-255" title="CBA_9897_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_9897_sm-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_9897_sm" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>Shot below is also 1/60 seconds at 120mm shot from inside a moving car on a malaysian slightly bumpy road. Most of the shots were able to nail it perfectly at a 1/60 shutter speed with VR set to Active.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-256" title="CBA_9896_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_9896_sm-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_9896_sm" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>An attempt at 1/30sec, the shake starts to appear. We can see some shakes in the image below yet again on a typical malaysian slightly bumpy road. <img src='http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-258" title="CBA_9886_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_9886_sm-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_9886_sm" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>and an attempt 1/60sec at 200mm, slight shakes kicks in.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-262" title="CBA_9891_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_9891_sm-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_9891_sm" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>As a conclusion, i can almost nail 3 shots out of 5 without handshake. But if you&#8217;re able to jack your ISO, getting a 1/100sec shutter speed, you almost can nail every shot without shakes.</p>
<p>Ok, enough with the in-car trying to shoot with a low shutter speed, lets take a look at static objects.</p>
<p>1/20 seconds at 200mm handheld.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-259" title="CBA_9989_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_9989_sm-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_9989_sm" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>yet another 1/20sec shot at 200mm handheld, very very mild shake.</p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-260" title="CBA_0015_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_0015_sm.jpg" alt="CBA_0015_sm" width="660" height="968" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center; ">
<p>a scenery shot from a high vantage point, 1/15sec at 80mm, for this shot, i had my hand leaning on wall for more stability.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-264" title="CBA_9998" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_9998-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_9998" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>a bad attempt to an even lower shutter speed, 1/13sec at 200mm handheld.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-261" title="CBA_0022_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_0022_sm-1024x697.jpg" alt="CBA_0022_sm" width="900" height="612" /></p>
<p>Bring it back up,  1/20sec at 200mm <img src='http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-263" title="CBA_0037_sm" src="http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CBA_0037_sm-1024x690.jpg" alt="CBA_0037_sm" width="900" height="606" /></p>
<p>Thats all folks for the sample shots i&#8217;d like to share. As a conclusion, the lowest shutter speed i could get down to handheld was 1/20 seconds. <a href="http://cliffmautner.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/10/101309-the-new-nikon-70200mm-f28g-ed-vrii.html">Cliff Mautner</a> manages the shots down to 1/13 sec at 200mm, but i couldnt, i guess i have really shaky hands. <img src='http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But nikon claims the VRII is able to compensate up to 4 stops, if i were using 200mm, i should have 1/200sec, 4 stops below is 1/13 second, and i only managed around 3.6 stops! i have shaky hands! but then again, the lens is darn heavy to hold on.</p>
<p>Lastly, this is an awesome lens, its built like a tank, it is also weather and dust proof, having better IQ corner to corner compared to VR1,  better vignette control and most importantly the VRII.</p>
<p>I personally love this lens and would definitely go for an upgrade. <img src='http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for reading. Hope you enjoy my small little review.</p>
	<div class="p3-fb-like-btn-wrap">
		<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.victor-hew.com%2Fgear%2Fpushing-the-limits-of-the-new-nikkor-70-200mm-vrii%2F&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=like&colorscheme=light&width=450&height=35" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:35px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
	</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/pushing-the-limits-of-the-new-nikkor-70-200mm-vrii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700 part 2 (ISO!!!)</title>
		<link>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/d700-part-2-iso/</link>
		<comments>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/d700-part-2-iso/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real life iso testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://victorphotoblog.wordpress.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, I think I&#8217;ll be blogging alot and telling everyone stories about how I really feel on this new system. Heck, I am still excited getting acquainted with the d700. I&#8217;m still going through the thick manual reading its function 1 by 1. Looking for a function in a nikon d700 is like going into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I think I&#8217;ll be blogging alot and telling everyone stories about how I really feel on this new system. Heck, I am still excited getting acquainted with the d700.  I&#8217;m still going through the thick manual reading its function 1 by 1. Looking for a function in a nikon d700 is like going into amazon jungle, you&#8217;ll have high chances of getting lost. It took me like 2 minutes to look through the menu to find the freaking auto ISO sensitivity option and turn it off. But I suppose its just a matter of getting use to it.<br />
I find canon&#8217;s big dial is more fun to play with.<br />
Yesterday, i fooled around with a 20mm lens shooting night scene handheld outside my apartment. Now i&#8217;m not gonna be comparing d700 ISO performance with 50D&#8217;s ISO performance, its just a different league, maybe someday i can borrow a d300 or a 5Dii and write to you about it&#8217;s ISO performance. I took the shots below at f4 at 1/30s shutter speed. Its noise performance is amazing. Check it out. erm, white balance for both shots is different, i was too excited shooting the 6400, i forget to set it back to the standard white balance.</p>
<p>ISO6400!!<br />
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3081/3171012768_a26c4e073f.jpg" alt="ISO6400" /><br />
You may view the really large size <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3081/3171012768_cec9dd1bd4_o.jpg">here.</a></p>
<p>ISO3200~~~<br />
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3286/3171013846_88e8d0625f.jpg" alt="iso3200" /><br />
Large size <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3286/3171013846_07888c7332_o.jpg">here.</a></p>
<p>However, i was a little curious about the noise performance of in camera jpeg and post processed raw file jpeg.<br />
So here is what i managed to fool around with.</p>
<p>This is direct from Camera at ISO6400<br />
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3479/3179746316_1872a2545e.jpg" alt="iso6400" /><br />
Large size <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3479/3179746316_1872a2545e_b.jpg">here.</a></p>
<p>While this is RAW file conversion<br />
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/3179746010_69e19dbe20.jpg" alt="iso6400 raw" /><br />
Large size <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/3179746010_69e19dbe20_b.jpg">here.</a></p>
<p>and here are iso 12800 and 25600 jpeg direct from camera</p>
<p>ISO12800<br />
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3419/3179749770_9427ae7731.jpg" alt="iso12800" /><br />
Large <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3419/3179749770_9427ae7731_b.jpg">here.</a></p>
<p>ISO25600<br />
<img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3266/3178914425_69195ae4f8.jpg" alt="iso25600" /><br />
Large <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3266/3178914425_69195ae4f8_b.jpg">here.</a></p>
<p>my next post, AF~~~ stay tuned. <img src='http://www.victor-hew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
	<div class="p3-fb-like-btn-wrap">
		<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.victor-hew.com%2Fgear%2Fd700-part-2-iso%2F&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=like&colorscheme=light&width=450&height=35" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:35px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
	</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/d700-part-2-iso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon d700</title>
		<link>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://victorphotoblog.wordpress.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a looong thought and much hesitation, I&#8217;ve finally decided to move to canon&#8217;s arch-enemy, nikon systems, as a start for this new year.  So I gathered all my courage  and ordered a nikon Full frame D700, as i knew my next camera has to be a full frame. But unfortunately, I&#8217;ve been waiting for the 5D [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a looong thought and much hesitation, I&#8217;ve finally decided to move to canon&#8217;s arch-enemy, nikon systems, as a start for this new year.  So I gathered all my courage  and ordered a nikon Full frame D700, as i knew my next camera has to be a full frame. But unfortunately, I&#8217;ve been waiting for the 5D replacement a year ago and was very excited over canon&#8217;s announcement over 2008 photokina. However, the 5DII&#8217;s spec is very much a disappointment for me. 21 mpx? I&#8217;m not sure if canon did any market survey on how many people needs a 21 mpx camera, definitely not me, so I would only use its sRAW which is 10mpx, still enough for my wedding work and landscape as I do not do large printing. The 3 year old autofocus? The ancient 9 plus 6 invisible autofocus point dated back in 1st generation 5D days, in which performance is crappier than a 50D? How is 5DII gonna compete in the coming 3 years until its replacement comes by? On top of that, I have to put up with possible chances of banding problems in sRAW mode, the mode in which i&#8217;ll be using and black dots all over my images on blown out highlights. The only thing I see fancy is the ISO performance which is pretty similar to D700, other than that, I don&#8217;t see a point on spending that much money on such a camera. hmm&#8230; in fact, I don&#8217;t understand why 5DII is even out of stock everywhere. So, how about the old 5D? The price for the old 5D is still RM7k, and a D700 costs only RM7.5k. For 500 extra, I get to upgrade to a newer system.</p>
<p>Those of you who knows me will know how much a big fan I am of canon, I&#8217;ve owned a few canon lens and body. I started from the very old 350D, up to a 30D, and 50D with a few nice L lenses and wide angles. Not a huge investment compared to those with 300mm f2.8L or big white sticks, but I suppose I do have put in quite a large amount to my gears.</p>
<p>My D700 came yesterday, I took the camera out from its box, my first thought was, will I ever be able to manage so many buttons? Nikon cameras has buttons all over the place, where as a Canon 50D looks like it has 2X less than it. Of course, Nikon doesnt have the big dial like canon, damn i&#8217;m gonna miss that big dial. After a few shots and manual readings, I find these buttons are great! They are like shortcuts for autofocus modes, I can flip between these modes in a flash without looking into the mini LCD, press the AF button and guess which dial should I dial to swap modes(sometimes i just forgets which dial i need to use to change modes on a 50D after you select the function change)</p>
<p>So far, the d700 has been performing extremely well on every shot I take. All I can say is its really putting my canon to shame. Every feature, every function nikon puts in their camera has a photographer&#8217;s thought in it. For example, the eyepiece shutter. Yes, Nikon has an EYEPIECE SHUTTER!! As for the canon, you have to MANUALLY remove the eyepiece, and try very hard  to cover the viewfinder with a piece of crappy rubber which comes along in the strap. What is that ancient manual crap? and maybe most of the canon users do not know what the hell is that rubber stucked in the strap if they do not read the manual.</p>
<p>So far, I&#8217;m still going through the manual for my D700, its like a dictionary, I suppose the size of manual comes in proportion to the number of buttons you have on camera, the manual is 2X thicker than the 50D. Will post more of my thoughts of Nikon camera from a Canon user point of view in my next blog. Stay tune.</p>
<p>The really thick nikon manual</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="manual" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1028/3165439425_3d62d519f9.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /> </p>
<p>My D700</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="D700" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3101/3163501924_6ab7026f72.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p>   <img class="alignnone" title="D700" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3257/3162670583_324a43728a.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="d700" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3267/3165446041_64a81c04e1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></p>
	<div class="p3-fb-like-btn-wrap">
		<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.victor-hew.com%2Fgear%2Fgoodbye-canon-hello-nikon%2F&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&action=like&colorscheme=light&width=450&height=35" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:35px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
	</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.victor-hew.com/gear/goodbye-canon-hello-nikon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

